成唯識論演祕 3.351

3.351

答：為二釋。一云同取，通力引生，遠取何失？如欲界根有長養等，既同發識，此亦應爾。二、不同取，言定等力據識緣境，又若異熟能發彼通，何須起彼天眼、耳根？亦同一處業力不同，見等各別，同處別發，亦復何失？按《智度論》，修得天眼在肉眼上，導彼肉眼亦能遠見。

Answer: There are two explanations. One says they grasp together: induced and produced by the power of abhijñā, what fault is there in grasping far away? Just as faculties of the desire realm have nurturance and so forth, since they produce consciousness together, this should also be like that. The second says they do not grasp together: the statement regarding the power of samādhi and so forth is based on consciousness cognizing objects; furthermore, if the vipāka [faculty] could produce that clairvoyance, why would it be necessary to give rise to those divine eye and ear faculties? Also, in the same place, karmic powers differ, and seeing and so forth are distinct; occupying the same place while producing them distinctly, what fault is there? According to the Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa, the acquired divine eye is situated above the physical eye, guiding that physical eye so that it can also see far away.