成唯識論演祕 3.809
成唯識論演祕 3.809
- Language
- Classical Chinese
3.809
詳曰：第三為勝，餘大小乘無有說故。若言雙破三、四計者，如何難云非互相熏？豈三、四計許互熏耶？
Detailed analysis: The third is superior, because none of the other Mahāyāna or Hīnayāna treatises say this. If one says that it jointly refutes the third and fourth tenets, how could it challenge them by saying 'they do not mutually perfume'? Would the third and fourth tenets allow mutual perfuming?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation