成唯識論演祕 4.325

4.325

有義：第二師釋文有其二，初正翻三位破，二引《瑜伽》為證。疏說引證，屬第三文，今不依也。引《瑜伽》文證五得以自類為依，不證第三遇勝境故。

There is a view that states: The text of the second master's explanation has two parts: first, directly refuting the three states; second, citing the Yogācārabhūmi as proof. The Commentary's statement that citing proof belongs to the third text is not followed here. Citing the Yogācārabhūmi text proves that the five [consciousnesses] can take their own kind as a basis, and does not prove the third [case] of encountering a superior objective realm.