成唯識論演祕 4.326

4.326

詳曰：乍觀論勢，誠有斯理，若審理披文，即疏為正，何所以者？舉增盛境證五相續，引《瑜伽論》自類為依，豈不顯五是相續耶？故下結云故知五識有相續義，雖復三因皆明相續，隨自因下所引之文以為別證，斯亦何失。

I examine [this and state]: At first glance at the flow of the Treatise, there is indeed this reasoning; but if one carefully examines the principle and investigates the text, then the Commentary is correct. Why is this? Bringing up an intensely prominent realm proves that the five are continuous; citing the Yogācārabhūmi that their own kind serves as a basis, does this not reveal that the five are continuous? Therefore it concludes below: 'Hence we know the five consciousnesses have the meaning of continuation.' Although all three reasons clarify continuation, taking the text cited under one's own reason as a distinct proof—what flaw is there in this?