成唯識論演祕 4.432
成唯識論演祕 4.432
- Language
- Classical Chinese
4.432
釋:此中難意,若四惑俱恒思量者,即出世位而無四惑,復不思量,何名末那?初答意云:夫立名者,但假施設未必稱義,故出世意雖不思量亦得名意,與疏稍別。
Exposition: The intent of the objection here is: If it always reflects in association with the four afflictions, then at the supramundane stage where there are no four afflictions, and it no longer [erroneously] reflects, why is it called manas? The initial answer means: established names are merely nominal designations and do not necessarily correspond to the meaning; hence the supramundane manas, though not [erroneously] reflecting, is still called manas. This is slightly different from the Commentary.
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation