成唯識論演祕 4.600

4.600

釋曰：此外難也。其難意云：七俱無明有餘見等三惑相應，應亦不得名為不共。若雖見俱，猶名不共，我前染意俱時無明。雖餘惑俱，何乃不許名為不共？

The explanation says: This is an external objection. The meaning of its objection is: 'The ignorance associated with the seventh [consciousness] is associated with the other three delusions such as the view [of self], so it should also not be named "unshared." If, although associated with the view, it is still named "unshared," then why do you not allow the ignorance occurring together with my previously mentioned defiled mind to be named "unshared," even though it occurs together with the remaining delusions?'