成唯識論演祕 5.208

5.208

詳曰：惡法違己，得世間名，為先厭之，後方輕拒，何理不得？故下文云，於己益損名自他故，故惡名他名世間者，而無有失。又厭、輕拒二義不同，若不先厭，何乃拒之？

I examine [this] and say: unwholesome phenomena go against oneself and receive the name 'worldly'; what principle prevents one from first feeling revulsion toward them and only afterward rejecting them with disrespect? Therefore, a later passage says that benefit and harm to oneself are called 'self' and 'other'; thus, there is no error in unwholesomeness being named 'other' and named 'worldly'. Furthermore, revulsion and rejecting with disrespect have two different meanings; if one does not first feel revulsion, how could one then reject them?