成唯識論演祕 5.284

5.284

問：忿等依嗔立，瞋位忿等無，行捨等依他，四法無方起，答設爾何失？若爾，云何十遍善心？有義問答，展轉釋之，文多不錄，但寫意云，忿等嗔分，與嗔不俱；捨等義別，故得俱起。難捨等義別，可名為假，忿既別生，應非假攝。

Question: Wrath and the rest are established based on ill will; in the state of ill will, wrath and the rest do not exist. Equanimity of activity and the rest are based on others; they arise only when the four factors are absent. Answer: Even if that were so, what fault would there be? If so, how could ten pervade wholesome minds? One opinion presents questions and answers that explain this back and forth; the text is voluminous and not recorded here, but its gist is copied: Wrath and the rest are parts of ill will, yet they are not concomitant with ill will; equanimity and the rest have distinct meanings, so they can arise concomitantly. The objection is: If equanimity and the rest have distinct meanings, they can be called nominal; since wrath arises distinctly, should it not be unincluded in nominal [entities]?