成唯識論演祕 5.334

5.334

詳曰：如名起義，既云貪佛，豈有貪法非是染執，名為善耶？若但欣求不起染執，誰言此等名之為貪？又誰不知是善法欲勞為分別？

Critical evaluation: One derives the meaning according to the name. Since one speaks of 'greed for the Buddha', how could there be greed for a dharma that is not a defiled attachment and yet is called 'wholesome'? If there is merely aspiration without defiled attachment arising, who would claim that this is called 'greed'? Moreover, who does not know that this is the desire for wholesome dharmas, such that one would labor to differentiate it?