成唯識論演祕 5.346
成唯識論演祕 5.346
- Language
- Classical Chinese
5.346
答:《瑜伽》五十八云:邪見者一切倒見,於所知事顛倒而轉,皆名邪見。當知此見略有二種:一者增益,薩迦耶等四見;二者損減,謗因果諸見。亦如《雜集》顛倒智言包於五見,《疏》若不置邪見言,而恐惑者不知邪定因於見也。若五別說,復繁言論,但云邪見文約旨明,理固無爽。又五十八云:有四無明,若於不見、聞、覺、知義中,所有無知,名無解愚;若於見、聞、覺、知所知義中,散亂、失念所有無智,名放逸愚;於顛倒心所有無智,名染污愚;不顛倒心所有無智,名不染污愚。
Answer: Fascicle 58 of the Yogācārabhūmi states: As for wrong view, all inverted views that operate invertedly with regard to knowable matters are called wrong view. One should know that this view has briefly two kinds: first, superimposition, namely the four views including satkāyadṛṣṭi; second, deprecation, namely the views that repudiate cause and effect. This is also like the phrase 'inverted cognition' in the Abhidharmasamuccaya-bhāṣya encompassing the five views. If the Commentary did not place the words 'wrong view', there was fear that confused persons would not know that wrong determination has view as its cause. If the five were stated separately, it would again make the discourse burdensome. Merely saying 'wrong view' makes the text concise and the purport clear; logically, there is certainly no error. Moreover, Fascicle 58 states: There are four kinds of ignorance. Any unknowing with regard to meanings that are not seen, heard, sensed, or known is called 'foolishness of non-comprehension'. Any non-wisdom due to distraction and loss of mindfulness with regard to meanings that are seen, heard, sensed, or known is called 'foolishness of negligence'. Any non-wisdom in an inverted mind is called 'defiled foolishness'. Any non-wisdom in an uninverted mind is called 'undefiled foolishness'.
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation
Linked texts (1)
- 瑜伽師地論 — Classical Chinese