成唯識論演祕 5.670
成唯識論演祕 5.670
- Language
- Classical Chinese
5.670
答：設爾，何違？二俱有失。若不迷者何名相應？所緣異故。若言迷者而因邪見之所引生，親義焉在？
Answer: Even if that were so, what is the contradiction? Both have defects. If it is not deluded, why is it called associated, since their objects would be different? If it is said to be deluded, but it is induced by wrong view, where is the sense of being direct?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation