成唯識論演祕 5.671

5.671

答：傳有三釋：一云：但言不共有親迷理，非皆親迷。二云：雖邪見力之所引生，不緣見起，故亦親迷。三云：悔俱無明亦是非主，由此染悔非親迷攝。有義斷云：然悔親迷其理難見，故說不共有非親迷。雖違論文，理相順也。

Answer: Traditionally, there are three explanations. The first says: To simply say "unshared" means there is a direct delusion regarding the principle, but it is not that all are directly deluded. The second says: Although it is induced by the power of wrong view, it does not arise by taking that view as its object; therefore, it is also directly deluded. The third says: The ignorance associated with remorse is also non-predominant; hence this defiled remorse is not included under direct delusion. An opinion determines: However, the principle of remorse directly deluding is difficult to see; therefore it is said that among the unshared, there is that which is not directly deluded. Although this contradicts the text of the treatise, it accords with the principle.