成唯識論演祕 5.699

5.699

詳曰：觀文察理兼論無傷，何所以者？且覺觀言：若梵本有，即不應責譯主加增；若梵本無，想唯識師不引此謬，取彼正論思惟之言，通證因果言說之由，竟有何失？論說說因甚明著故。更思。

The analysis states: Examining the text and scrutinizing the principle, taking the treatise along with it causes no harm. Why is this? If the words "vitarka and vicāra" existed in the Sanskrit text, one should not fault the translator for adding them; if they did not exist in the Sanskrit text, it is conceivable that the Vijñaptimātra master did not cite this error. Taking the word "thought" from that correct treatise to prove the ground for both cause and effect of speech throughout—what fault is there after all? For the treatise's statement of the cause of speech is extremely clear and obvious. Consider this further.