成唯識論演祕 6.327

6.327

詳曰：論中何有以能詮、所詮、生起次第會違之處，據論無此言論無會，何有非理？又疏會云：《對法》唯依染分相生以說因果，而隱不云言助論主別立道理，依初染因，一何蔽人，彰自甚乎！

We examine: Where in the Treatise is there any reconciliation of contradictions in terms of expressive sign, what is expressed, and sequential arising? Based on the Treatise lacking this, to say the Treatise does not reconcile them—how is that unreasonable? Furthermore, the Commentary reconciles them by saying: "The *Abhidharmasamuccaya* speaks of cause and fruit solely based on reciprocal arising of the defiled part"; yet concealing this, it does not state that it assists the Treatise master in separately establishing the principle based on the initial defiled cause—how this obscures others to make itself conspicuous in the extreme!