成唯識論演祕 6.431

6.431

詳曰：律、不律儀既名為色，為業眷屬助招引、滿，何理相違？諸教皆言由善、惡戒生善、惡故。《疏》亦不言五根、境等為眷屬也，自義不足，彈《疏》有餘。

We comment: Since discipline (saṃvara) and non-discipline (asaṃvara) are named form (rūpa), what contradiction in principle is there in their serving as the retinue of karma to assist in inducing and fulfilling [retribution]? All teachings say that due to good and bad morality, good and bad [destinies] are born. Furthermore, the Commentary does not state that the five faculties, sense-objects, and so forth are retinues. His own position being deficient, he has an excess of criticism toward the Commentary.