成唯識論演祕 7.256

7.256

答：喻依少分，非一切同，故不應責。即第二果前、後并自以為三種，第二劫中三位不同，少同彼也。

Answer: The analogy is based on a partial aspect and is not identical in all respects; therefore, one should not fault it. That is, the stages before, after, and including the second fruit itself are taken as three kinds; the three stages within the second aeon differ and are partially similar to that.