成唯識論演祕 7.291

7.291

詳曰：不同煩惱，地地九品，分為麁、細，斷之前、後，言「無品數」，非言無彼愛、恚等類名「無品」也，故《疏》無違。若言不染義同合一，豈彼經中唯對二乘辨五住地？若兼菩薩，何唯不染？對彼菩薩是應染分，如煩惱障，既不別開，故知不約不染合也。

I examine this and say: It is not like the afflictions, which have nine grades for each ground and are divided into coarse and subtle, and abandoned earlier or later; hence it is said to have 'no categories and degrees.' It does not mean that it has no kinds such as craving or aversion that it is called 'lacking categories.' Therefore, there is no contradiction in the Commentary. If one says that because their non-defiled nature is identical they are combined into one, could it be that that sūtra only distinguishes the five grounds of abiding for the two vehicles? If it also includes bodhisattvas, why would it be merely non-defiled? For those bodhisattvas, it constitutes the defiled aspect, just like the afflictive hindrances; since they are not opened separately, we know they are not combined based on being non-defiled.