成唯識論演祕 7.384

7.384

詳曰：雖有理，然諸教中並無說是安立處故。故知安立唯依四諦差別觀說，與四勝義立有不同，不可為例。故《對法論》第九云：「安立者，謂聲聞等隨自所證已得究竟，為欲令他亦了知故，由後得智以無量種名、句、文身安立道諦。謂諸諦中有如是如是忍、如是如是智。」但約四諦辨安立也。

Examination: Although this has reason, nevertheless none of the teachings state that this is an established conventionality. Thus we know that conventionality is explained solely relying on the distinct contemplations of the four noble truths, and is distinct from the establishment of the four ultimate truths, so it cannot be taken as an analogy. Hence the ninth fascicle of the Abhidharmasamuccaya-bhāṣya states: 'Establishment refers to the śrāvakas and others, who, following what they have personally realized and attained to completion, in order to enable others to understand as well, establish the truth of the path through the posterior cognition by means of immeasurable categories of names, phrases, and syllables. That is to say, within the truths there are such-and-such patiences and such-and-such cognitions.' It distinguishes conventionality only in terms of the four truths.