成唯識論演祕 7.688

7.688

《佛地》第三大意同之，稍廣此也，并顯相應總名為「智」。彼云：如是四智轉何法得？《攝大乘》說轉識蘊得，何故轉心而得心法？非得心法，四無漏心智相應故，假說名「智」。故《論》說言：問：正智當言實有、當言假有？

Fascicle three of the Buddhabhūmy-upadeśa has the same general meaning, slightly broader than this, and shows that the associated [factors] are collectively named "wisdom." It says: Transforming what dharmas are these four wisdoms attained? The Mahāyānasaṃgraha says they are attained by transforming the aggregate of consciousness; why is a mental factor attained by transforming citta? It is not that a mental factor is attained; because the four anāsrava cittas are associated with wisdom, they are metaphorically designated as "wisdom." Therefore, the Treatise says: Question: Should correct wisdom be said to be substantially existent or metaphorically existent?