成唯識論演祕 7.702

7.702

詳曰：後釋為正，既自在智非唯根本，現身、土相，何理不能？第二理通，鏡智本故。初釋非也。

Detailed analysis: The latter interpretation is correct. Since the masterly gnosis is not merely the fundamental [non-conceptual gnosis], by what reasoning could it be incapable of manifesting the marks of bodies and lands? The second [interpretation's] reasoning is acceptable, because the mirror-like gnosis is the root. The first interpretation is not [correct].