唯識二十論述記 2.7

2.7

述曰：自下第二，論主正破，合有五頌，於中有三：初之一頌，合破小乘外道二種；次有三頌，正破小乘；後有一頌，正破外道，設破小乘。此即初也，就初頌中，第一句破外道，下三句破小乘；破小乘中，第一句破古薩婆多毘婆沙師；下二句破經部及新薩婆多順正理師。又非和合等，立宗；極微不成故，立因。驗此兼破極微和集，此唯識論，世親年邁。正理論後方始作也，至下當知。

The Commentary says: From here below is the second part, where the treatise master directly refutes them, comprising five verses in total, in which there are three parts: the first single verse refutes both Hīnayāna and non-Buddhist systems together; the next three verses directly refute Hīnayāna; the final verse directly refutes non-Buddhists while hypothetically refuting Hīnayāna. This is the first verse. Within the first verse, the first line refutes non-Buddhists; the lower three lines refute Hīnayāna. Within the refutation of Hīnayāna, the first line refutes the ancient Sarvāstivāda-Vaibhāṣikas; the lower two lines refute the Sautrāntikas and the Neo-Sarvāstivāda Nyāyānusāra masters. 'Nor again a combination and so forth' establishes the pratijñā; 'because paramāṇus are not established' establishes the hetu. Verifying this, it also refutes the aggregation of paramāṇus. When composing this Viṃśikā śāstra, Vasubandhu was advanced in age; it was only composed after the Nyāyānusāra, as should be understood below.