唯識二十論述記 2.272

2.272

If so, in your school, since seeing form and the like when awake is truly existent, seeing form and the like when dreaming should likewise not be non-existent. Although seeing form is identical in meaning, the existence and non-existence of its objects would be unequal. Or, for the Sarvāstivāda, the objects of dream and waking are both existent, yet the actions performed and future results are different; what prevents my thesis that there are no objects, and although waking and dream are identical, the actions performed and results induced are distinct? The objections and explanations here could go back and forth endlessly; fearing burdensome text, I briefly indicate the outline. Those who are wise should reflect upon this accordingly.