唯識二十論述記 2.85

2.85

The Commentary says: The first two lines show the fault of having parts; the latter two lines clarify the fault of lacking parts. The meaning of the first two lines is clear; in the latter two lines, there are three refutations in total. If it lacks spatial divisions, it should cast no shadow and present no obstruction. The third line of the verse contains these two objections, refuting the lack of spatial divisions. The fourth line of the verse refutes the opponent's revised defense: if aggregate forms are not different from paramāṇus, and paramāṇus lack both [shadow and obstruction], then aggregate forms should lack shadow and obstruction. Re-establishing the previous meaning will be known below. However, the verse in the old translation is divided into three parts: the first two lines form one part, and the latter two lines form one each.