大乘百法明門論疏 2.43

2.43

問：「諸論或言二十四數、或言二十三數，已如上解，何故《五蘊論》中唯有十四，無流轉等十？」

Question: "That various treatises state either the number twenty-four or the number twenty-three has already been explained above. Why does the *Pañcaskandhaka* have only fourteen, lacking the ten beginning with continuity?"