大乘百法明門論疏 2.42

2.42

解云：「已說在所說中，所以但偏略不和合性也。言說在所說中者，謂異生性，是見道煩惱假建立，望聖道有不得義故，即是不和合義。不和合中，略舉一隅，餘不和合，類亦可知，所以偏略不和合性。《瑜伽》、《顯揚》、此論並有二十四者，此據異生外別有不和合名，所以餘論中言二十四也。」

The explanation says: "It is already expressed within what has been stated; therefore it specifically omits only disharmony. Saying 'it is expressed within what has been stated' means that the state of an ordinary person is nominally established based on the defilements abandoned upon the path of seeing, and in relation to the noble path it has the sense of non-attainment, which is precisely the meaning of disharmony. Within disharmony, it briefly raises one aspect; other disharmonies can be known by analogy, which is why it specifically omits disharmony. As for the *Yogācārabhūmi*, the *Prakaraṇāryavācā*, and this treatise having twenty-four, this is based on having a separate designation of disharmony apart from the state of an ordinary person; therefore other treatises speak of twenty-four."