因明入正理論疏 1.96

1.96

問：「何故宗中傍有義准名為差別，因喻便無？」答：「能立本成，成自所立隨應之義，立乃乖角，共自相違，故於宗中傍有義准，則四相違所違差別。言申決定方成能立，故於因、喻不說亦有，義准能立。」

Question: "Why is an implied meaning in the thesis called a qualification (viśeṣa), while in the reason and example there is none?" Answer: "The proof is fundamentally established to establish its own probandum as appropriate; but when the thesis is contradictory, mutually conflicting with itself, an implied meaning is indirectly present in the thesis—namely, the qualifications contradicted by the four contradictory [reasons]. Only when verbal expression is definitive does it constitute a proof; therefore, the reason and example are not said to have an implied proof."