因明入正理論疏 1.95

1.95

問：「何故因、喻無隨自樂，宗獨有之？」答：「宗兩乖諍，須隨自簡；因喻共許，故無隨自。因喻二種，如共比量，必先共許方成能立，無遍許失及承稟失。要言所陳方名因、喻，不說亦有傍義差別，無義准失。自他比量言亦有簡，說許執故；隨其不顧，故於因、喻不說隨自。」

Question: "Why do the reason and example not have 'intended according to oneself', while the thesis alone has it?" Answer: "The thesis involves contradiction and dispute between the two parties, so it requires 'according to oneself' to specify it; the reason and example are mutually accepted, hence there is no 'according to oneself'. The reason and example, as in a shared inference (ubhayānumāna), must first be mutually accepted before they can constitute the proof; thus they have neither the fallacy of universal acceptance nor that of traditional reception. They are called reason and example only when stated in words; they are not said to have implied qualifications, so they have no fallacy of implication. In one's own and the other's inferences, the words also contain qualifiers, stating 'accepted' or 'asserted'; because one disregards [school tenets] accordingly, 'according to oneself' is not stated for the reason and example."