因明入正理論疏 2.101

2.101

頗有現量相違亦比量、自教相違？如以現量合二有二十八四句，以比量合二有二十一四句，自教合二有十五四句，世間合二有十種四句，自語合二有六四句，能別合二有三四句，所別合二有一四句，如是三合總有八十四種四句。頗有現量相違亦比量、自教、世間相違耶？如以現量合三有二十一四句，比量合三有十五四句，自教合三或有十種四句，世間合三有六四句，自語合三有三四句，能別合三有一四句，如是四合總有五十六種四句。頗有現量相違亦比量、自教、世間、自語相違耶？如以現量合四有十五四句，比量合四有十種四句，自教合四有六四句，世間合四有三四句，自語合四有一四句，如是五合總有三十五種四句。頗有現量相違亦比量、自教、世間、自語相違，能別不極成耶？如以現量合五有十種四句，比量合五有六四句，自教合五有三四句，世間合五有一四句，如是六合總有二十種四句。頗有現量相違亦比量、自教、世間、自語相違，所別、能別不成耶？如以現量合六有六四句，比量合六有三四句，自教合六有一四句，如是七合總有十種四句。頗有現量相違亦比量、自教、世間、自語相違，能別、所別俱不成耶？如以現量合七有三四句，比量合七有一四句，如是八合有四四句。頗有現量相違亦餘八過耶？如是九合有一四句。上來二合乃至八合，有二百一十種四句，并前一箇三十六種四句，總計合二百四十六種四句。前云且答現量一箇八種四句。

Can contradiction with perception also be contradiction with inference and contradiction with one's own doctrine? For instance, taking perception combined with two [others], there are twenty-eight tetralemmas; taking inference combined with two, there are twenty-one tetralemmas; one's own doctrine combined with two has fifteen tetralemmas; worldly consensus combined with two has ten tetralemmas; one's own words combined with two has six tetralemmas; the qualifier combined with two has three tetralemmas; the qualificand combined with two has one tetralemma: thus, the combinations of three have a total of eighty-four tetralemmas. Can contradiction with perception also be contradiction with inference, one's own doctrine, and worldly consensus? Taking perception combined with three, there are twenty-one tetralemmas; inference combined with three has fifteen tetralemmas; one's own doctrine combined with three has ten tetralemmas; worldly consensus combined with three has six tetralemmas; one's own words combined with three has three tetralemmas; the qualifier combined with three has one tetralemma: thus, the combinations of four have a total of fifty-six tetralemmas. Can contradiction with perception also be contradiction with inference, one's own doctrine, worldly consensus, and one's own words? Taking perception combined with four, there are fifteen tetralemmas; inference combined with four has ten tetralemmas; one's own doctrine combined with four has six tetralemmas; worldly consensus combined with four has three tetralemmas; one's own words combined with four has one tetralemma: thus, the combinations of five have a total of thirty-five tetralemmas. Can contradiction with perception also be contradiction with inference, one's own doctrine, worldly consensus, one's own words, and unestablishedness of the qualifier? Taking perception combined with five, there are ten tetralemmas; inference combined with five has six tetralemmas; one's own doctrine combined with five has three tetralemmas; worldly consensus combined with five has one tetralemma: thus, the combinations of six have a total of twenty tetralemmas. Can contradiction with perception also be contradiction with inference, one's own doctrine, worldly consensus, one's own words, and unestablishedness of the qualificand and qualifier? Taking perception combined with six, there are six tetralemmas; inference combined with six has three tetralemmas; one's own doctrine combined with six has one tetralemma: thus, the combinations of seven have a total of ten tetralemmas. Can contradiction with perception also be contradiction with inference, one's own doctrine, worldly consensus, one's own words, and unestablishedness of both qualifier and qualificand? Taking perception combined with seven, there are three tetralemmas; inference combined with seven has one tetralemma: thus, the combinations of eight have four tetralemmas. Can contradiction with perception also be the remaining eight fallacies? Thus, the combination of nine has one tetralemma. The combinations of two up to the combinations of eight above have two hundred and ten tetralemmas; adding the previous single thirty-six tetralemmas, the grand total is two hundred and forty-six tetralemmas. What was mentioned earlier provisionally answered the eight tetralemmas for the single [fallacy of] perception.