因明入正理論疏 3.178

3.178

問：「言修定者離教分別，豈諸定內不緣教耶？」答：「雖緣聖教，不同散心計名屬義、或義屬名。兩各別緣，名離分別，非全不緣，方名現量。若不爾，無漏心應皆不緣教。」

Question: 'It is said that those who cultivate meditative absorption are free of conceptual construction regarding doctrine; do they not cognize doctrine within all absorptions?' Answer: 'Although they cognize the noble teachings, unlike the distracted mind they do not impute names to belong to objects, or objects to belong to names. Apprehending both separately is called "free from conceptual construction"; it does not mean that one only qualifies as pratyakṣa by not cognizing [doctrine] at all. Were it not so, pure minds (anāsrava-citta) would all fail to cognize doctrine.'