因明入正理論疏 3.177

3.177

問：「別明於五，五根非一，各現取境，可名現現別轉。餘三如何名現別轉？」答：「各附體緣，不貫多法，名為別轉。文同《理門》，義何妨別？」

Question: 'If separately explaining the five [consciousnesses], the five sense-faculties are not single, each perceptually grasping its object, so it can be called "distinct operation in each immediate presence." How can the remaining three be called "distinct operation in immediate presence"?' Answer: 'Each apprehends by conforming to its own substance, not pervading multiple entities; this is called "distinct operation." Although the phrasing is identical to the Nyāyamukha, what prevents the meaning from being distinct?'