因明入正理論疏 3.45

English (machine translation) 3.45

Language: English

3.45

Question: 'Furthermore, as they say: "The impermanence of sound should not act as an object of cognitive apprehension of the impermanence of sound; because of being produced; like a pot and so forth"—should this be contradictory to the qualification of the predicate?' Answer: 'This too is not so. That commits the fault of being unestablished for both (ubhayāsiddha). Regarding the subject "impermanence," both parties do not accept that it possesses the property of being produced; this too is subsumed under pseudo-refutation. So too with "ought not to be an impermanence whose conditions have ceased," and so forth—all should be understood according to this.'

Previous: 3.44
Next: 3.46
Up: 3

Linked texts (1)

因明入正理論疏 — Classical Chinese