因明義斷 1.16

1.16

有人云：相傳解云，陳那已前相者體相，非指《瑜伽》等，如前以引。破古體者，廣如《理門》。

Someone says: 'The traditional explanation states that the "mark" prior to Dignāga is the essential mark, not referring to the *Yogācārabhūmi* and the like, as cited before.' Refutations of ancient essential marks are detailed in the *Nyāyamukha*.