大乘起信論義記 3.180

3.180

答文有二：初明雖差別而不二，後「復以何義」下，明雖不二而差別。前中亦二：初明實德雖多同一如味，次釋成不二。以無分別者，非能分別故。離分別相者，非所分別故。次無能所分別，故無二也。

The text of the reply has two [parts]: first, explaining that although differentiated, they are non-dual; later, from 'for what meaning again' on, explaining that although non-dual, they are differentiated. In the former there are also two: first, explaining that although real virtues are many, they are of the same single taste of thusness; next, explaining and establishing non-duality. 'Without discrimination' means not being that which can discriminate. 'Free from the marks of discrimination' means not being that which is discriminated. Because it is free of both the discriminating and the discriminated, therefore it is non-dual.