起信論疏筆削記 12.54

12.54

論　不同下，二、正遣相應。疏二：初、正釋翻前義。既無等者，如單己一人，與誰為同？故無相應義也。

[Regarding] the text of the treatise, "unlike", and so on: second, it directly eliminates conjunction. The commentary has two parts: first, directly explaining by reversing the previous meaning. [Regarding] "Since there is no...", and so on: it is like a single, solitary person—with whom could he be identical? Therefore, there is no meaning of conjunction.