起信論疏筆削記 12.57

12.57

非是下，三、揀濫。此中言不相離者，以染心即不覺故，非謂有於王數相應而言不離，以相應、不離二義別故。下文引證，是下生滅相中文。此文雙證二義：一證不相離義、二證不是相應義。在文可見。

[Regarding] "It is not that...", and so on: third, distinguishing confusion. What is spoken of here as "inseparable" is because the defiled mind is precisely non-enlightenment; it does not mean that there is conjunction of king and concomitants and that they are spoken of as inseparable, for the two meanings of "conjunction" and "inseparability" are distinct. The text adduced below as proof is a passage under the section on the marks of arising and ceasing. This text jointly proves two meanings: first, it proves the meaning of inseparability; second, it proves the meaning of not being conjunction. This is visible in the text.