起信論疏筆削記 12.57

12.57

[Regarding] "It is not that...", and so on: third, distinguishing confusion. What is spoken of here as "inseparable" is because the defiled mind is precisely non-enlightenment; it does not mean that there is conjunction of king and concomitants and that they are spoken of as inseparable, for the two meanings of "conjunction" and "inseparability" are distinct. The text adduced below as proof is a passage under the section on the marks of arising and ceasing. This text jointly proves two meanings: first, it proves the meaning of inseparability; second, it proves the meaning of not being conjunction. This is visible in the text.