起信論疏筆削記 17.48

17.48

又亦下，類攝前文。前約法說，此約人說，理無別也。皆是下，釋類攝所以。以前文是本覺隨染之文，今顯果位，亦即本覺隨染，二文既同，故應相攝其實，亦同四鏡中之後二也。雖約性淨、隨染為門之異，而法體無別。

Regarding “Furthermore, it also” and so forth: It subsumes the earlier text by analogy. The former spoke in terms of dharmas, while this speaks in terms of persons; their principle is no different. Regarding “All are” and so forth: It explains the reason for analogical subsumption. Because the earlier text was text on original enlightenment according with defilement, and now the fruition stage is revealed, it is likewise original enlightenment according with defilement; since the two passages are identical, they should mutually subsume. In fact, it also corresponds to the latter two among the four mirrors. Although there is the difference of gates in terms of essential purity and according with defilement, the essence of the dharma is without distinction.