起信論疏筆削記 19.25

19.25

論　即復下，二、離相。疏　唯心寂者，此唯心之相亦不可得。前則離能所分別，唯一實相，名為正念。今則正念亦無自相，以凡所有相皆虛妄故，斯則亦不知知寂，亦不自知知，自性了然，故不同於木石也。

The Treatise states: "It then further..." downward: Second, transcending marks. The Commentary states: "mind-only is quiescent": this mark of mind-only is also unobtainable. Previously, one transcended the conceptual differentiation of subject and object, leaving only the single true mark, which was called right mindfulness. Now, right mindfulness itself has no self-mark, because whatsoever has marks is entirely empty and false; this then means that one also does not know the knowing of quiescence, nor does one inherently know knowing, yet its self-nature is lucidly clear; hence it is not like wood and stone.