肇論疏 1.91

1.91

第二、單引一論以明空也。文中有二：前，正引論；後，釋論意也。一切諸法一切因緣故應有者，諸法皆從因緣故有也。一切諸法一切因緣故不應有者，諸法皆從緣故，非定有也。一切無法一切因緣故應有者，諸法本無，從緣故有也。一切無法一切因緣故不應有者，諸法從緣有者，以從緣故，非定有也。

Second, citing a single treatise to clarify emptiness. Within the text there are two parts: first, properly citing the treatise; later, explaining the intention of the treatise. 'All dharmas, because of all causes and conditions, should exist': all dharmas exist because of causes and conditions. 'All dharmas, because of all causes and conditions, should not exist': because all dharmas are dependent on conditions, they are not determinately existent. 'All non-existent dharmas, because of all causes and conditions, should exist': dharmas are originally non-existent, but exist dependent on conditions. 'All non-existent dharmas, because of all causes and conditions, should not exist': dharmas that exist from conditions, because they are from conditions, are not determinately existent.