肇論新疏 1.138

1.138

初二句中經論隨計破著說遷、不遷，物不必然也。次四句躡前，已明遷而不遷、不遷而遷。後四句復躡前，已明遷即不遷、不遷即遷。故非重也。所以不會二乘者，以二乘但稟無常之教而修，故唯會教人可悟也。

In the first two lines, the sūtras and treatises speak of moving or not moving in accordance with calculations to shatter attachments, but things are not necessarily so. The next four lines follow the preceding, already clarifying moving yet not moving, and not moving yet moving. The last four lines again follow the preceding, already clarifying that moving is none other than not moving, and not moving is none other than moving; thus they are not redundant. The reason [the text] does not harmonize the two vehicles is that the two vehicles merely receive the teaching of impermanence and cultivate it; thus by merely harmonizing the teaching, people can be awakened.