肇論新疏 1.227

1.227

何必非有無此有、非無無彼無？此直好無之談，豈謂順通事（物也）實（性也）、即物之情（解也）哉？

"Why must 'not existent' mean negating this existence, and 'not non-existent' mean negating that non-existence? This is simply a talk of fondling non-being; how could it be said to accord with and penetrate phenomena (things) and reality (nature), or be an understanding (comprehension) of things as they are?"