肇論新疏 2.372

2.372

初四句可知。所以下二句，承前釋成權實雙現。次一句雙亡。後一句離著。能所兩亡，無執也。有無雙非，不拘也。孰能下，結責。謂動靜二智非異，有知無知何殊？

The first four sentences are evident. The two sentences from "Therefore..." follow the preceding to explain and establish the simultaneous manifestation of upāya and tattva. The next sentence negates both. The following sentence departs from attachment. Both subject and object perishing is "no grasping." Existence and non-existence being doubly negated is "no constraint." From "Who could..." onward concludes with criticism, meaning that the two cognitions of activity and quietude are not different; how could knowing and not-knowing be distinct?