肇論新疏 2.406

2.406

承前無異，以答不取。故復標談者，此但先出問意，然後答之。差謂以權實不一之心，觀空有兩殊之境，謂言靜智無知、動智覩變，豈無知取乎？脫，亦忽也。

Following the preceding non-difference, this answers regarding non-grasping. Therefore he again marks the speaker; this merely first presents the intent of the question, and afterward answers it. The error is to think that with a mind in which upāya and tattva are not one, one contemplates the realm in which emptiness and existence are two different things, claiming that tranquil cognition has no knowing and active cognition beholds change—how could there not be grasping in knowing? "Perhaps" (tuo) also means suddenly/unawares.