肇論新疏 1.98

1.98

The first three sentences are the inverted views of ordinary sentiments; the two sentences from 'Motion and...' downward reveal the meaning. The first sentence restates the clinging; from 'because things of the past' downward it provides the reason. Because they see things changing and departing into the past, only going and not coming, they call it flux. The next three sentences bring up awakening. The two sentences from 'rest and...' downward reveal the meaning. The first sentence brings up awakening, and from 'also because' downward it provides the reason. Things of the past do not reach the present, and things of the present do not go to the past—what motion is there? Present and past are mutually dependent and their marks are fundamentally empty; things exist within them without going and without coming.