肇論新疏 2.160

2.160

Both entail faults. This follows upon the preceding to raise an objection, meaning that if not grasping conforms with non-knowing, it would mean that the sage mind is obscure and dark, like a person traveling at night unable to distinguish black and white; if having grasping conforms with knowing, how could there be knowing without grasping? This objects to the earlier statements, "never grasps a known" and "wisdom is not without knowing."