肇論新疏 2.92
English (machine translation) 2.92
- Language
- English
2.92
Yet when the sūtra says prajñā is pure, could it not be because the essential nature of prajñā is truly pure, originally devoid of the knowing that grasps in delusion? Since it is originally devoid of the knowing that grasps in delusion, it cannot be designated by the name "knowing." How could it merely be that the absence of knowing is called "without knowing"? Knowing is naturally without knowing.
Linked texts (1)
- 肇論新疏 — Classical Chinese