肇論新疏 3.67

3.67

The Way of nirvāṇa is neither sound nor form; how could one take remainder as existence, and no-remainder as non-existence, pointing out places based on conventional labels, asserting that entrusting form to the royal palace is existence, and extinguishing traces in the twin śāla trees is non-existence? To speak of its wondrous Way in such a manner, is that not far wide of the mark? This completes the preceding text regarding the provisional names that respond to things.