大乘法苑義林章 4.25

4.25

第三出體性者，此以五見中二見為體，一邊見、二邪見。《對法》第一說「問：六十二見何見所攝？答：或二或一切。」覺師子釋言「二者，自性故。一切者，眷屬故。」《瑜伽》五十八、《成唯識》第六云「邊見差別，謂執前際四遍常論，四一分常論，及計後際有想十六，無想、俱非各有八論，七斷論等邊執見攝。」《瑜伽論》第五十八說「常見所攝六十二見，謂計前際諸遍常論、一分常論，及計後際諸有想論、無想論、非想非非想論。斷見攝者，謂七事斷論。常見攝四十，斷見攝七，總合邊見攝四十七。」《成唯識》及五十八云「邪見差別有執前際，二無因論、四有邊等論、四不死矯亂論，及計後際五現涅槃論。如是邪見攝十五見，故說自性二見所攝。若并眷屬，五見所攝，同類等流相引生故。如是即顯通不善有覆，別境慧攝。」

Third, regarding identifying their essential nature (svabhāva): these take two of the five views as their essence: first, extreme view (antagrāhadṛṣṭi), and second, false view (mithyādṛṣṭi). The first fascicle of the Abhidharmasamuccaya asks: "Question: Which views subsume the sixty-two views? Answer: Either two, or all [five]." Buddhasiṃha explains: "'Two' is due to essential nature. 'All' is due to their retinue." The fifty-eighth fascicle of the Yogācārabhūmi and the sixth fascicle of the Cheng weishi lun state: "Regarding the divisions of extreme view, clinging to the future limit via the four theories of universal eternalism, the four theories of partial eternalism, and, positing the future limit, the sixteen theories of conscious survival, the eight theories of unconscious survival, the eight theories of neither, and the seven theories of annihilation, etc., are subsumed under extreme clinging view." The fifty-eighth fascicle of the Yogācārabhūmi states: "The sixty-two views subsumed under eternalist views are the theories of universal eternalism and partial eternalism that posit the past limit, and the theories of conscious survival, unconscious survival, and neither-conscious-nor-unconscious survival that posit the future limit. Those subsumed under annihilationist views are the theories of sevenfold annihilation. Eternalist views subsume forty, and annihilationist views subsume seven; together, extreme views subsume forty-seven in total." The Cheng weishi lun and the fifty-eighth fascicle state: "The divisions of false view are: those clinging to the past limit, namely the two theories of causelessness, the four theories of finitude, etc., and the four theories of amarāvikkhepa; and those positing the future limit, namely the five theories of nirvāṇa in the present life. In this way, false view subsumes fifteen views. Therefore, it is said that their essential nature is subsumed under two views. If their retinues are included, they are subsumed under the five views, because those of the same class and outflows induce and generate one another. Thus, it is shown that they are common to the unwholesome and the obscured-unmanifest, and are subsumed under the mental factor of discriminative wisdom (viniyata-mati)."