法界圖記叢髓錄 1.48

1.48

法記云：何者是法？借因分詮。若強指者，汝身心是。何是性？即圓融是也。云何圓融？無二相故。一故無二，二而無二耶？非是一，故無二。即其二相，直云無二。何是諸法？法性是也。何故不動？圓融故。何故本來寂？無二相故。本來寂處可得名耶？不可名目，以無名故。何故無名？以無相故。何故無相？絕一切故。若爾，此中修證亦絕耶？絕也。實無修證耶？實無也。然而聖亦修證，要須修證。如何修證？若可誨者是教分故，唯大文夫善用心處，非餘境也。此證分中一切諸法具耶闕耶？具也。若爾，亦具遍計非法耶？何得具耶？爾則闕耶？何得闕耶？謂無有一物非普法故。何得具耶？不動遍計非法即滿足法，何得闕耶？故儼師云：一乘中何法缺？非法缺；何法不缺？非法不缺也。

Fa's Record says: What is dharma? We borrow the causal aspect to explain it. If pointing forcibly, it is your body and mind. What is nature? It is perfect interfusion. How is it perfectly interfused? Because there are no dual characteristics. Is it non-dual because it is one, or is it non-dual while being two? It is not that it is one and therefore non-dual; it is directly said to be non-dual in the very presence of two characteristics. What are all dharmas? They are dharmatā. Why are they immovable? Because of perfect interfusion. Why are they originally calm? Because there are no dual characteristics. In the locus that is originally calm, can a name be obtained? It cannot be named, because it is nameless. Why is it nameless? Because it is signless. Why is it signless? Because it cuts off everything. If so, are cultivation and realization also cut off herein? They are cut off. Are there truly no cultivation and realization? Truly there are none. Yet the sages also cultivate and realize, and it is necessary to cultivate and realize. How does one cultivate and realize? If it can be instructed, it belongs to the teaching aspect; it is solely the place where the great person applies his mind well, not the realm of anything else. Within this realization aspect, are all dharmas complete or deficient? They are complete. If so, does it also possess the imaginary non-dharmas? How could it possess them? Then is it deficient? How could it be deficient? This means that there is not a single thing that is not the universal Dharma. How could it possess them? Without moving, the imaginary non-dharmas are themselves the fulfilling dharmas; how could it be deficient? Therefore Master Yan said: "In the One Vehicle, what dharma is deficient? Non-dharmas are deficient. What dharma is not deficient? Non-dharmas are not deficient."