法界圖記叢髓錄 2.85

2.85

法融云：無分別者，此十錢中每一一錢隨舉無側，不可標指故也。不守自性者，二不守性三四，及十亦不守自成一之體，故云隨緣，故云不住也。以一事辨一多者，由一有十故，若取其一，則二三乃至十皆不成。故呼一之時，十皆口許吾亦一吾亦一也。以一之多故，云辨一多，故即盡也。以異事辨一多等者，呼二之時，十皆口許我是二等，故云以異事辨一多，故不盡也。謂以二盡十、以三盡十，乃至以十盡十，皆初一錢之不盡德也。問：以二事辨二多者，是第二錢之盡也。此第二之不盡何耶？答：以一事辨一多、以三事辨三多等，皆是第二之不盡也。問：藏師所云一中十故盡之一，與十中一故不盡之一何別？答：同也。問：若爾，何故十中一則不盡耶？答：一中具十，故云一中十，故盡也。具十之一，但為第一之一而盡十，不為第二第三乃至第十而盡十，故云十中一故不盡也。謂一中十之一者，具二、具三，乃至具十之一也。十中一之一者，不能為二攝十、不能為三攝十，乃至不能為十攝十之一也。

Farong said: Regarding 'without discrimination': within these ten coins, each and every coin, whichever is picked up, is without bias and cannot be singled out. Regarding 'not maintaining its own nature': two does not maintain its nature into three and four, and ten likewise does not maintain its essence of forming one on its own; therefore it is said to accord with conditions, and hence it is called non-abiding. Regarding 'distinguishing the one and the many through one phenomenon': because through one there is ten, if one takes that one, then two, three, up to ten are all unformed. Therefore, at the time of calling out 'one', all ten verbally grant, 'I too am one, I too am one.' Because the many belong to the one, it is called 'distinguishing the one and the many', and therefore it is exhausted. Regarding 'distinguishing the one and the many through different phenomena', etc.: at the time of calling out 'two', all ten verbally grant, 'I am two', and so on; therefore it is called 'distinguishing the one and the many through different phenomena', and therefore it is unexhausted. That is, using two to exhaust ten, using three to exhaust ten, up to using ten to exhaust ten, are all the unexhausted virtues of the initial one coin. Question: Distinguishing the many of two through the phenomenon of two is the exhaustion of the second coin. What is the unexhausted of this second coin? Answer: Distinguishing the one and the many through the phenomenon of one, distinguishing the three and the many through the phenomenon of three, and so on, are all the unexhausted of the second coin. Question: What is the distinction between the one of exhaustion because of 'ten in one' and the one of non-exhaustion because of 'one in ten', as stated by Master Zang? Answer: They are identical. Question: If so, why is it unexhausted in 'one in ten'? Answer: One contains ten, hence it is called 'ten in one', and is therefore exhausted. The one containing ten only exhausts ten as the one of the first, and does not exhaust ten as the second, third, up to the tenth; therefore it is said to be unexhausted because of 'one in ten'. That is, the one of 'ten in one' is the one that contains two, contains three, up to contains ten. The one of 'one in ten' is the one that cannot gather ten for two, cannot gather ten for three, up to cannot gather ten for ten.